“Lack of transparency on leaders’ health issues creates a dangerous insecurity in governance.” — Brookings experts
Nigerians have been uneasy over President Bola Tinubu’s recent absences from public view. Independent trackers note at least eight trips to France (59 days total) since 2023, often described as “private visits”.
In August 2025, for example, Tinubu chaired a media event on Aug 1. He then missed the D’Tigress basketball victory gala two days later. Vice-President Kashim Shettima went in his place.
Such unexplained gaps have fuelled speculation that the President’s frequent foreign travel masks a serious health problem. Yet official sources deny any secret illness.
Tinubu’s aides insist he remains active: as spokesman Bayo Onanuga put it,
“the President is working” – he was even “in his office yesterday (August 5)… he came to work”.
Onanuga says rumours of a bedridden president are “baseless” and blames social media for spreading panic.
Paris Trips and Health Speculation
News reports confirm Tinubu’s heavy travel schedule. Nigerian media have documented his itineraries. These include a 14‑day “private” trip in Jan 2024 and a 4‑day stopover in Aug 2024. They also include a Nov 2024 official visit to President Macron, a Feb 2025 layover in Paris en route to Addis, and an 18‑day stay in France/UK in April 2025.
Over two years he has spent “over 50 days in France across several visits”. Critics question why so much time was spent abroad.
PDP chieftain Olabode George complained that Tinubu “took off to Paris for reasons best known to him” amid domestic crises.
Activist Omoyele Sowore noted on social media that a state security emergency unfolded in Edo State. During this time, “the President travels to France”.
Journalist Shehu Gazali Sadiq tweeted scathingly about the “money wasted on an old sickly man taking campaign tours to France”.
The Tinubu camp rejects these suggestions. A spokesperson called any health rumours “baseless propaganda,” stressing that the President works remotely “more than even in the office”.
Official press releases have continued. On Aug 6, the government announced Tinubu’s policy directives for retirees’ healthcare and pensions. This announcement was accompanied by a photo from a meeting at his private residence.
Buhari’s old habit of flying abroad for routine checks adds context. He spent three months in London in 2017. Unlike Buhari’s announced leave, Tinubu has never publicly acknowledged any medical reason.
An Africa Check fact‑check warns that images and posts implying he was hospitalized are hoaxes.
In short, credible outlets have found no evidence to confirm the wildest rumours – only conjecture by bloggers.
The Cancer Claims
The most sensational claim is that Tinubu has stage-3 cancer. It seems to originate with a viral Facebook post by self-styled analyst Mike Arnold. No reputable news organisation or medical source has verified this.
The Presidency has not publicly addressed it beyond general denials of illness. (Senior assistant Abdulaziz Abdulaziz told BBC Hausa that reports Tinubu was “bedridden” were false.)
In July 2025, Tinubu made visible public appearances (rewarding Nigeria’s women’s soccer team) that showed no obvious frailty. In the absence of confirmation from doctors or witnesses, independent fact‑checkers treat the stage‑3 claim as unsubstantiated.
African media note that rumours about Tinubu’s health have been common but often debunked. For example, a widely circulated photo of “Tinubu on a hospital bed” was proven to be fabricated. It was a superimposed image of an unrelated patient.
First Lady Remi Tinubu
Many accounts also mention First Lady Oluremi (Remi) Tinubu as a powerful figure in a so‑called “shadow regency”. In reality, Remi Tinubu is a public figure but holds no formal executive power. A former three‑term Lagos Central senator and ordained pastor, she has championed charity and spoken on unity.
Western media recently spotlighted her soft‑power role. At the 2026 US National Prayer Breakfast, Donald Trump singled her out. He described her as a “very respected woman… a Christian pastor”.
Editorial writers have praised her as a “brand ambassador.” They note that a Christian First Lady married to a Muslim President sends a strong message of faith‑based unity.
Domestically, Mrs. Tinubu has posted online about solidarity and condemned hate against leaders.
None of this suggests an authoritative “regency.” Nigerian press coverage presents Remi Tinubu mostly as a symbolic figure. She is seen as a bridge between communities, not as a decision-maker. We found no credible reporting that she is directing government affairs or surreptitiously issuing orders.
Observers see her influence as one of public narrative, not of constitutional authority. As Vanguard put it, her visibility “can temper religious anxieties” by embodying co‑existence.
Remi Tinubu remains a visible partner on the global stage. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of a secret first-lady dominion.
NSA Nuhu Ribadu and US Lobbying
National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu looms large in these discussions. A former anti‑corruption “czar” under Obasanjo, Ribadu is now Tinubu’s first civilian NSA. In that role he supervises the military chiefs and security strategy.
Ribadu’s office recently approved a controversial foreign contract: Nigeria has signed a $4.5m (six‑month) retainer with a US lobbying firm, DCI Group, via Kaduna lawyer Aster Legal.
The contract’s language explicitly commits Nigeria to communicate its actions to protect its Christian communities. It aims to secure continued US backing against jihadist threats.
In practice, the lobbying push was a response to Donald Trump’s 2025 threat to “halt…persecution of Christians” in Nigeria.
State and opposition reactions are mixed. Government sources portray Ribadu’s mission as a legitimate defense of national interests; critics call it an expensive PR campaign.
There have been public complaints that while Nigeria spent millions, Biafran separatist lobbyists asked for far less. Some opposition voices have questioned Ribadu’s motives, recalling that he once denounced many of the very officials now in office.
Transparency International’s Auwal Rafsanjani commented: “I think Nuhu Ribadu is a different person now… He is interacting with the same people he referred to as looters.”
Ribadu’s critics see a shift: photos recently showed him smiling alongside a former governor he once helped prosecute. Supporters argue he’s simply fulfilling Tinubu’s security agenda.
On the matter of lobbying, no laws were broken – Congress filings are public – but the optics are sensitive. (Indeed, Congress has discussed this contract and the broader issue of Nigeria’s image.)
For our purposes, the key point is: the $9m lobbying deal is confirmed by credible reports. It is not a mere internet rumour. As NSA, Ribadu can lawfully engage foreign consultancies.
The Omokri Factor (2031 Speculation)
Former presidential aide Reno Omokri has been another lightning rod. Omokri was an outspoken Tinubu critic in 2023, even accusing him of shady past dealings. But in early 2026 he made public amends.
During a media tour he said he had “long apologised to Tinubu” and accepted the Supreme Court’s ruling. He also announced an ambassadorial nomination under Tinubu.
None of this confirms any conspiracy; it simply marks Omokri’s return to a more reconciled stance.
Rumours that Omokri and Ribadu are plotting a secret “Tinubu II” campaign for 2031 using public funds appear baseless. We found no evidence of any such scheme in the public domain.
These whispers seem to originate from partisan blogs. The media have not reported that Omokri ended his advocacy for Leah Sharibu, the kidnapped girl. The information is only available from Omokri’s own online posts.
In short, Omokri’s reversal on Tinubu is documented. His apology and cooperation are also recorded. However, linking it to a hidden 2031 ticket with Ribadu is pure conjecture.
Vice-President Shettima: Role and Reputation
Constitutionally, Vice-President Kashim Shettima is next in line if the Presidency is incapacitated or vacated. The 1999 Constitution makes the president and vice-president a joint ticket (Section 141). It provides that if the President is unable to discharge his duties, the VP “shall act as President”.
If Tinubu were to resign or die, Shettima would become president for the remainder of the term. (If both offices fell vacant, the Senate President would serve pending an election.)
Publicly, Shettima is known as a quiet, thoughtful figure. He is a former Borno State governor. He presided over the most violent insurgency years. Many credit him with steady leadership under fire. Yet, there are criticisms too, from both North and South.
Some Yorubas resented the Muslim‑Muslim 2023 ticket (Tinubu‑Shettima), and some Northern hardliners grumbled about sharing power with the Southwest. Amid the current rumours, these tensions have re‑surfaced.
Notably, when an APC rally in Shettima’s home region (Borno) unveiled endorsements for 2027, delegates were enraged. They saw Shettima’s name omitted. They angrily chanted “No Shettima, no APC”.
Analysts warned that dropping him as Tinubu’s running mate would be “a grave miscalculation.” This decision could cost the ruling party northern support. These episodes show that, for now, Shettima enjoys substantial grassroots loyalty in the North.
An op-ed commenter on the crisis argued that Nigeria badly needs Shettima’s “commanding voice.” His insurgency-hardiness is also required in the Presidency right now.
In practice, though, Tinubu tends to delegate major security issues to others (Ribadu, military chiefs) more than Shettima.
The vice-president so far has chaired some councils but his public profile remains lower than his predecessor Yemi Osinbajo’s was.
Shettima’s sudden elevation without an election would pose a legitimacy question. This scenario is similar to what happened with Yar’Adua to Jonathan. Nonetheless, it would follow the letter of Nigeria’s law.
The bigger concern is the political fallout. A non‑Yoruba, non‑southwestern president, like Shettima from the Northeast, could upset the delicate power rotation norms of the ruling party. This may alienate southern constituencies.
Lessons from Yar’Adua/Jonathan and African Context
History offers a cautionary parallel. In 2010–2011, President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua’s secret illness nearly toppled the government. He became extremely ill in Saudi Arabia, but no official hand‑over was made.
Vice‑President Goodluck Jonathan repeatedly asked for a letter of authority. The National Assembly faced weeks of stasis and threats of a coup. They invoked the “doctrine of necessity” to make Jonathan Acting President.
Jonathan recalls that Nigeria was on “edge… under the north‑south divide,” with coup rumours every day . Only a unified civil society (the Save Nigeria Group) and the eventual formal handover letter prevented a breakdown.
This episode underlines global findings: concealing a leader’s health breeds instability. Across Africa, at least 22 presidents have died in office. This often occurs in keeping with a culture of silence. Thirteen of those cases were mired in illness rumours.
Ghana’s 2012 transition from John Atta Mills, who died in office after a long undisclosed illness, to John Mahama was peaceful. This was possible only because it respected constitutional succession.
In contrast, when continuity is unclear, countries have risked coups and panic. Brookings experts thus urge that transparent health disclosures are vital. Clear term limits are also essential to avoid “dangerous insecurity” during leadership crises.
Public Opinion and Media Reaction
Public sentiment is divided. On social media and in activist circles, many Nigerians express anger and fear. As noted, opponents on X (Twitter) invoke Tinubu’s European trips as proof of incapacitation.
Some human rights groups have quietly petitioned for clarity. Meanwhile, mainstream Nigerian media have mostly relayed official statements or stayed silent.
Major papers and broadcasters have not pressed the issue aggressively. This may be due to the sensitive nature of personal health. It could also be because of potential government pressure or normal deference to authority.
Independent outlets like The ICIR have been among the few to investigate rigorously.
An ICIR report uncovered that even routine government communications were being managed to suggest normalcy.
For example, a presidential press release on Aug 6 is related to Tinubu’s message to retirees. It was back-dated from a meeting at his private home.
When the Ghana Defence Minister Edward Omane Boamah and others were killed in a plane crash, a condolence statement from Tinubu was released. Later, staff revealed he had personally called to issue it.
Yet everyday administrative matters have faced delay. ICIR sources say a new CEO for the NNPCL (state oil firm) was appointed. However, the announcement stalled.
An insider told ICIR that “the final confirmation depends on President Tinubu, who, due to his current health, has been unable to make any decisions”.
Such leaks fuel public suspicion that something is amiss.
On the other hand, state television and government-friendly papers have portrayed Tinubu as patient and delegating normally.
Vice‑President Shettima and ministers regularly appear on camera, and official communiqués continue. The perception gap is expanding. Grassroots Nigerians describe a presidency “invisible to the people.” Meanwhile, the Aso Rock insists all is well.
Broader Implications
The stakes are high. If President Tinubu’s illness (temporary or permanent) creates a power vacuum, the 1999 Constitution would thrust Shettima into the presidency. This could reset Nigeria’s delicate political balance.
Within Tinubu’s own party (APC), a new southern vice-president would likely need to be chosen. This person would run the remaining term and contest the 2027 election.
Meanwhile, any sign of a hidden “kitchen cabinet” (beyond Remi Tinubu and Ribadu) risks undermining trust. After Yar’Adua, we observed that the mere impression of a backroom cabal worsened national tension. This so-called “cabal” involved the EFCC and generals.
Internationally, a prolonged crisis in Nigeria – Africa’s largest economy – would alarm foreign governments and investors.
The Trump administration is focusing on Nigeria’s Christian minority. The Pentagon is interested in counter-terrorism. This focus means that Washington is watching closely (hence the lobbying contract).
Instability could also embolden insurgent groups. Already, the lack of a visible leader has coincided with a spike in kidnappings and attacks.
Worldwide, leaders’ hidden illnesses have had deep consequences. For example, Gabon’s Omar Bongo died secretly in office (2009), and uncertainty led to political maneuvering.
Kenya’s late president Mwai Kibaki in 2013 had health scares, and cabinet infighting occurred.
African commentators often note that conceding a single day of incapacity is seen as weakness. Yet too often, history shows that not disclosing fosters speculation and crisis.
Conclusion
In summary, independent investigation of the Tinubu affair yields a mixed picture. Medical travel and health concerns are real enough to merit attention, but hard evidence of life‑threatening illness is lacking.
Journalists, analysts, and citizens have raised legitimate questions about transparency. Yet, official channels continue to dismiss them.
Remi Tinubu emerges as a unifying figure. She is not a usurper. Nuhu Ribadu is a powerful NSA. He has spent public funds on a U.S. PR campaign, and Kashim Shettima as the constitutionally destined successor whose popularity remains regionally vital.
Comparisons to the Yar’Adua–Jonathan transition remind us that Nigeria has navigated such danger before. This was only possible through formal processes and a vigilant civil society.
At the time of writing (27 February 2026), much remains uncertain. The public sentiment is wary, and Nigeria’s media has been cautious.
Going forward, transparency will be essential. Openly acknowledging Tinubu’s condition is necessary. Adhering clearly to constitutional succession rules can reassure a fractious country.
Until then, the rumors and their implications will continue to cast a shadow over Nigeria’s fragile polity.
Follow us on our broadcast channels today!
- WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
- Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
- Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng
