The Nigerian Army this week announced a string of coordinated operations that it says dealt significant blows to criminal networks across the country between 29 November and 1 December 2025.
The official statement was published on the Army’s public channels. It credited troops in the North East and North Central theatres with neutralising eight terrorists. They arrested 51 suspects and rescued 27 victims. The troops also recovered a wide arsenal, including rifles, ammunition, detonators, and gelatine explosives.
Taken at face value these figures mark a tactical success. They also form part of a steady tempo of operations that the military has sustained since the 2015–16 counterinsurgency surge.
The latest sweep included ambush and clearance operations in Borno. These operations reportedly neutralised four ISWAP or JAS fighters. They also recovered AK-47s and encrypted radios.
In the North Central and North West theatres, units operating under Operation Whirl Stroke took action. Units operating under Operation Enduring Peace also reported success in their missions. They said they rescued 20 victims. They also arrested alleged kidnappers, human traffickers, and illegal miners. Additionally, they seized rustled cattle.
In Kaduna state, troops intercepted vehicles carrying explosives and fuses. If verified, this interception points to a dangerously escalatory trend in the weaponisation of the national insecurity.
But numbers alone do not settle the debate about strategic effect. The operational wins sit beside stark strategic and humanitarian data. More than 22 million people remain internally displaced in the north east. An estimated 35 million Nigerians are displaced by conflict across the country. These figures are compiled by displacement tracking and UN agencies. They reflect the long tail of violence and the limited traction of kinetic responses alone.
Those disruptive social effects are the metric by which tactical victories must be judged.
Comparative perspective helps. The current operations resemble earlier phases like Operation Lafiya Dole and Operation Hadin Kai. These operations focused on clearing insurgent enclaves. They also aimed at degrading command and control.
Historically these operations have produced measurable battlefield effects: significant insurgent casualties and the temporary recapture of towns. Yet insurgent or criminal networks adapt with dispersal. They use hybrid tactics. They infiltrate local economies through illegal mining, cattle rustling, and oil theft.
Recent reports show that troops shut illegal refineries and seized stolen crude. Joint raids with the NDLEA arrested 25 drug suspects. These events underline how the security challenge increasingly blends insurgency, organised crime, and economic predation.
One of the most arresting elements of the Army statement was the capture of a notorious gunrunner. His name is Shuaibu Isah, also known as Alhaji. He was allegedly attempting to obtain 1,000 rounds of ammunition.
The arrest is a notable policing success if it is fully corroborated in court. Gunrunners act as force multipliers for both jihadists and criminal gangs. Yet as with earlier high profile arrests, the key test will be prosecution. It will involve sustained intelligence exploitation. Another crucial element is tracking the money trail to financiers and corrupt facilitators.
There are open questions that demand scrutiny. First, casualty attribution and the chain of custody of recovered materiel must be transparent. Independent verification reduces the risk of inflated claims and helps build local trust.
Second, the interception in Kaduna of 5,000kg of gelatine explosives and thousands of metres of cordtex, as reported by the Army, suggests a potential shift. This shift may be towards mass casualty devices or attacks on infrastructure.
The implication is that security planning must be rebalanced. It should prioritise explosives detection. Protection of soft targets, including places of worship, markets, and transport hubs, is also essential.
Third, abductions and communal violence persist in the North Central and North West. This shows that clearing operations without governance interventions leave a vacuum. This vacuum is quickly reoccupied by criminal entrepreneurs.
The record of the last decade demonstrates that military pressure must be paired with justice. It also requires livestock management reforms and land use policy adjustments. Additionally, economic alternatives for youths drawn into illegal mining and banditry are necessary.
International partners and donors repeatedly stress that security force expansion without accountability and improved civil protections produces short lived gains.
Finally, media and civil society must press for after action reviews that are open, factual and timely. The Army’s reaffirmation of commitment to safeguard Nigerians is welcome. But for the citizen who has lost family, livestock, or land, the claim that “terrorists and criminals have no safe haven” will count only when the pattern of violence shows sustained decline. Judicial outcomes need to be visible, and the displaced must be able to return.
Tactical successes are necessary. They are not sufficient. The security challenge is as political as it is military. The long term solution requires integrated policy that pairs credible force with institution building and economic recovery.
For editors and policymakers the imperative is clear. Celebrate operational wins. Demand transparency on seizures and prosecutions. Use battlefield intelligence to dismantle wider networks. And above all, transform episodic operations into a sustained strategy. This strategy should reduce displacement, restore governance, and break the profit chains that fund violence.
Follow us on our broadcast channels today!
- WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
- Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
- Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng
