The recent audit of the FADAMA III inputs distribution in Jigawa State has laid bare a brazen conspiracy by local government officials to siphon life-changing farm inputs away from the very peasant farmers they were meant to uplift.
What follows is an in-depth, critical exposé of how political patronage and endemic corruption subverted a cornerstone of Nigeria’s agricultural development strategy, undermining food security, eroding public trust—and potentially swaying the outcome of local elections.
Initiated in 1992 as a pilot irrigation and support scheme, FADAMA has evolved through three major phases to become Nigeria’s flagship community-driven agricultural programme.
Under FADAMA III (2007–19), over 1.2 million households—an estimated 5.8 million individuals—received grants for irrigation, seedlings, livestock and training, with 36 percent of beneficiaries women.
The project reported a stellar economic internal rate of return (EIRR) of 47 percent, testament to its design and adaptive, bottom-up implementation.
Yet, in Jigawa State, the audit committee’s report—secured exclusively by SaharaReporters—reveals that all 27 local government chairmen colluded to submit fabricated names of “farmers” to claim FADAMA slots.
After promising genuine agrarians, they instead fielded intermediaries who sold off inputs, diverting subsidies worth tens of millions of naira.
“The LG Council Chairmen told us that the slots will help them during election,” admits Aminu Isah, the suspended State FADAMA CARES coordinator, in his written testimony to the committee.
Shockingly, the corruption extended beyond council halls. The audit notes that “some members of the Jigawa State House of Assembly, Honourable Commissioners, Permanent Secretaries, and Heads of some Jigawa State Government Agencies also benefitted from the programme,” further muddying accountability.
Despite Isah’s insistence that all approvals were “endorsed by the Honourable Commissioner of Agriculture” and signed off by the Finance Commissioner as Steering Committee Chairman, inputs vanished into private hands.
Jigawa’s FADAMA scandal echoes a broader Nigerian malaise. Since independence, the country is estimated to have lost over US $400 billion to high-level graft—an amount sufficient to eradicate extreme poverty and transform infrastructure nationwide.
Previous performance audits of FADAMA II in Abuja (2012) and FADAMA III across other states have flagged mismanagement, but never on this scale or with such direct electoral motives.
For the peasant farmers—men and women eking out subsistence on marginal plots—FADAMA inputs were a lifeline. Yet complaints of “no show” prompted the audit, as genuine beneficiaries saw empty hands while impostors cornered fertiliser and seedlings.
Nigeria’s agricultural sector accounts for roughly 24 percent of GDP and employs over 35 percent of the labour force; diverting these resources not only devastates rural incomes but imperils national food security.
Local government officials brazenly weaponised FADAMA slots for political gain, believing that controlling who “benefits” would translate into votes.
This cynical calculation underscores a fusion of governance and campaign finance that undermines democratic integrity and the very purpose of state-sponsored development.
State Response: Suspensions and Stern Rhetoric
In January 2024, Governor Umar Namadi’s administration suspended Aminu Isah and all 27 LGA desk officers following a State Executive Council resolution.
The government spokesman, Sagir Musa, confirmed the suspension citing the enquiry report ﹣ yet no prosecutions have followed.
In December 2024, Governor Namadi publicly decried delays and “poor arrangements” by agro-dealers distributing wheat inputs, signalling continued concern but little remedy.
This scandal demands more than disciplinary transfers. It calls for criminal investigations, asset-tracing and prosecution of guilty officials, and the wholesale overhaul of beneficiary identification—perhaps via biometric and community verification protocols.
Only then can FADAMA reclaim its reputation as a champion of Nigeria’s smallholder farmers.
By exposing the collusion between political office-holders and corrupt networks, this investigation underscores the imperative for transparency, accountability and civic vigilance.
For a programme designed to empower the marginalised, the betrayal is stark—and the stakes for Nigeria’s food security and democratic health could not be higher.
Follow us on our broadcast channels today!
- WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
- Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
- Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng
