Breaking News

EFCC Explains Why It Must Re-launch Kalu’s Trial After ‘Technical Ambush’ By S/Court

Forner Abia State Governor Orji Uzor Kalu in handshake with President Muhammadu Buhari while Mr Osita Okechukwu and former Ogun State Governor Ibikunle Amosun looks on.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commision (EFCC) has explained why it has decided to re-launch the corruption trial of former Abia State Governor Orji Uzor Kalu after describing the Supreme Court judgement that nullified the earlier trial as a technical ambush and an unfortunate development.

In its judgement, which was delivered on Friday, the Supreme Court based its verdict on the fact that Justice Mohammed Idris, who convicted the former governor, had been elevated to the Court of Appeal before the judgment. And added that it was illegal for Justice Idris to had returned to the Federal High Court to deliver the judgment.

The EFCC made this declaration in a statement signed on Friday by the commission’s new spokesperson, Mr Dele Oyewale.

The EFCC vowed to relaunch its full prosecutorial machinery to ensure that justice was served, in view of the Supreme Court judgement.

He said: “The attention of the Economic And Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, has been drawn to the judgment of the Supreme Court nullifying the trial of a former governor of Abia State, Orji Kalu , his firm, Slok Nigeria Limited and Jones Udeogu, a former Director of Finance and Account of Abia State Government and ordering their fresh trial at the lower court.

“The apex court based its verdict on the grounds that Justice Mohammed Idris, who convicted Kalu and others had been elevated to the Court of Appeal before the judgment and returned to the lower court to deliver the judgment which it considered as illegal”, it said.

“the EFCC considers the judgment of the apex court as quite unfortunate . It is a technical ambush against the trial of the former governor. The Commission is prepared for a fresh and immediate trial of the case because its evidences against Kalu and others are overwhelming.

“The corruption charges against Kalu still subsist because the Supreme Court did not acquit him of them. The entire prosecutorial machinery of the EFCC would be launched in a fresh trial where justice is bound to be served in due course.”

Advertisements