ABUJA, Nigeria — North-east Nigeria has been jolted by fresh reports that a Nigerian Army colonel and other soldiers were killed in Monguno, Borno State, in an overnight attack that again exposes how fragile the security situation remains in the theatre of war.
Premium Times says military authorities had not issued an official statement when it went to press, while other reports identified the slain officer as Colonel I.A. Mohammed or Muhammad and linked him to the 242 Battalion.
What makes this latest episode more alarming is the growing suggestion that the assault was not a simple ambush, but part of a more complex attack pattern involving drones, improvised explosives and ground fighters.
The attacker identity is also already disputed in the public space. Some reports frame the attackers as Boko Haram, while others point to ISWAP, the Boko Haram splinter that has repeatedly been linked to recent strikes in Borno.
That confusion is itself revealing, because it shows how the insurgency has become tactically fluid even when its labels remain politically convenient.
The drone allegation is the most disturbing part of the story. Nigeria’s own military has been warning for months that militants in the North-east are using armed and weaponised drones.
Reuters reported in January that militants backed by armed drones raided a base in Borno, destroyed military vehicles and killed soldiers, while a March Reuters report again described an assault in which insurgents advanced on foot and deployed armed drones.
TheCable reported in February that terrorists in West Africa were using more drones in attacks, while THISDAY quoted the Theatre Commander of Operation Hadin Kai, Major General Abdulsalam Abubakar, as saying:
“Since November last year, we’ve seen terrorists deploying weaponised drones.”
That is why the Monguno report should not be read as just another battlefield incident. It sits inside a clear pattern of insurgent adaptation.
In 2025, lawmaker Ahmed Jaha warned publicly that Boko Haram had returned with “deadlier tactics”, including the use of weaponised drones, and he said the group was now using weapons the army was struggling to counter.
The same warning was echoed by another Borno lawmaker in the House. Whether the latest Monguno attack is ultimately pinned on Boko Haram or ISWAP, the underlying message is the same: the insurgents are learning, adjusting and exploiting gaps in Nigeria’s counter-insurgency posture.
The timing is also significant. Just days earlier, Reuters and AP reported that an army general and several soldiers were killed in another assault in Borno, underscoring how hard the insurgents are pressing military positions across the state.
Reuters described Borno as the epicentre of Nigeria’s 17-year Islamist insurgency, while AP reported that President Bola Tinubu had confirmed the death of Brigadier General Oseni Omoh Braimah after the Benisheikh attack.
In other words, Monguno is not an isolated flashpoint. It is part of a widening pattern of pressure against military formations, commanders and supply routes.
The unanswered questions are now as important as the casualties.
Was Colonel Mohammed or Muhammad killed by a remotely detonated explosive device, as some sources say, or was he struck by a drone-delivered explosive before the convoy was ambushed?
Did the attackers hit a Forward Operating Base, a reinforcement column, or both?
Why has there been no immediate, detailed public briefing from the army?
Premium Times has already noted that the military had not issued an official statement, and that silence leaves room for contradictory accounts to harden into competing versions of events.
This is not a minor problem of communications. It is a strategic problem. If armed drones are now part of the insurgents’ toolkit in Borno, then the Nigerian state is facing a more technically adaptive adversary than it has publicly admitted in some quarters.
That is an inference from the documented drone trend, the army’s own previous warnings, and the recent Reuters reporting on drone-backed assaults.
It points to the need for stronger counter-drone detection, tighter convoy discipline, better protection for forward bases and more honest public messaging about the scale of the threat.
For families of soldiers in the North-east, the bitter reality is that another senior officer has fallen in a war that keeps changing shape while the state struggles to keep pace.
For the wider public, Monguno is another warning that the insurgency has not faded into history. It has mutated. And until the army gives a clear account of what happened, the story will remain a grim mix of battlefield loss, tactical uncertainty and official silence.
Follow us on our broadcast channels today!
- WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
- Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
- Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng





Join the debate; let's know your opinion.