The African Democratic Congress has finally locked down a venue for its national convention in Abuja, ending hours of uncertainty after senior party figures alleged that the party was being quietly frustrated by the state.
The new venue, announced by ADC Vanguard on X, is the Rainbow Event Center in Garki, with the party giving detailed location markers including Plot 1193a, Off Southern Parkway, behind the FCDA/AGIS building and close to the NTA Headquarters.
The shift comes at a highly charged moment for the party, which is already battling a leadership crisis and a bruising standoff with the Independent National Electoral Commission.
The timing is politically explosive. Within hours of the venue confirmation, the ADC was still nursing the fallout from claims by Kola Ologbondiyan that the party had struggled to secure a place in Abuja after what he described as obstruction from official and private quarters.
In his account, the party applied for Eagles Square through the office of the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike, but got no approval despite acknowledgement of the request.
He also said the party was turned away from the Velodrome at the Moshood Abiola National Stadium, while private event centres reportedly backed away for fear of harassment.
That allegation has now become the central political fight around the convention. The party’s public line is that the setback was not random, but part of a wider pattern of pressure against an opposition force trying to organise itself before the 2027 election cycle.
The Guardian reported that the ADC had already been denied two venues without clear reasons, including one initial approach to the Abuja Transport Hilton, and added that the party had “sensed sabotage” before settling on the Rainbow Event Center.
That wording has sharpened suspicion, although the claim remains an allegation and not a finding of fact.
The Presidency has rejected the accusation. Sunday Dare, President Bola Tinubu’s special adviser on media and communication, said there was “no design to have only APC on the ballot in 2027” and insisted that opposition parties remain free to function.
He added that “there are 20 political parties in Nigeria today” and argued that the APC would not close shop because other parties are in crisis.
That response is meant to blunt the optics of a ruling party being accused of squeezing the opposition, but it also leaves unresolved the deeper question of why the ADC says it encountered so many barriers in so short a period.
The bigger problem for the ADC is that the venue row sits on top of an unresolved leadership war that has now spilled into the courts and into INEC’s administrative machinery.
The electoral commission recently removed the names of the David Mark-led national working committee from its portal and said it would not deal with either faction until the Federal High Court determines the dispute.
INEC said it would maintain the status quo ante bellum and would not monitor any meeting, congress or convention convened by any group in the party until the matter is settled.
That is not a small procedural matter. It effectively leaves the party in a legal and operational fog just days before its convention.
David Mark has already moved to challenge INEC’s action in court. The Guardian reported that he filed a motion on 7 April seeking orders that would compel INEC to restore the party’s leadership names and reverse the delisting.
The dispute also involves Nafiu Bala Gombe, who claims a competing right to the party structure, while former chairman Ralph Nwosu’s resignation in 2025 remains part of the back story to the current split.
In plain terms, the party is not merely choosing a convention venue. It is trying to prove it still has a functioning centre of authority.
The convention drama cannot be separated from the broader opposition mobilisation that has built up around the ADC in recent weeks.
On 8 April, a high-profile protest at INEC headquarters brought together figures including Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rabiu Kwankwaso, Rauf Aregbesola, Rotimi Amaechi and Aminu Tambuwal, all of whom challenged the commission’s handling of the party’s crisis.
That protest signalled that the ADC has become more than an ordinary party quarrel. It is now a test case for how much room Nigeria’s opposition will be allowed to breathe before 2027.
What makes this episode so politically sensitive is that both sides are now speaking the language of democratic rights.
The ADC says it has documentary evidence that INEC previously recognised its leadership transition and is now creating conditions that may prevent it from fielding candidates.
INEC says it is protecting the court process and refusing to create a fait accompli. The government says there is no anti-opposition plot.
Each side is invoking legality, but the public sees a harsher picture, one in which Nigeria’s opposition is being dragged through a maze of suspicion, rivalry and state power just as the 2027 contest begins to take shape.
For now, the immediate story is simple. The ADC has a venue. But the bigger story is that a party which hopes to present itself as a serious national alternative is still fighting to prove that it can hold a convention, speak with one voice and survive who they call an increasingly hostile political environment.
The Rainbow Event Center may now host the event on 14 April, but the real battle is no longer about chairs, canopies or microphones. It is about who controls the opposition space in Nigeria, and who gets to decide how much of that space remains open.
Follow us on our broadcast channels today!
- WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
- Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
- Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng
