President Bola Tinubu’s decision to nominate former INEC chairman Professor Mahmood Yakubu for an ambassadorial posting has provoked a blistering response from opposition leader Atiku Abubakar. This decision exposes a raw and unresolved wound in Nigeria’s democratic body politic.
In a blistering statement posted on his verified X account, the former vice-president said the move is “morally indefensible.” It risks the appearance of a quid pro quo. Additionally, it will further erode public trust in electoral institutions.
The nomination came as part of a second batch of ambassadorial nominees. This batch was transmitted to the Senate on 30 November 2025. The Presidency asked the Senate to “consider and confirm” the list expeditiously.
That list included 15 career and 17 non-career nominees. Among them were former INEC boss Prof Mahmood Yakubu and several senior political figures. SaharaReporters first drew attention to the composition and timing of the second tranche.
Atiku’s critique is not merely partisan venting. It rests on the memory of the febrile 2023 election cycle in which Professor Yakubu presided as INEC chairman.
The 2023 presidential contest ended with low turnout and widespread allegations of operational failure: official records list about 93.47 million registered voters but only some 26.7% turnout, and the declared winner, Bola Tinubu, secured roughly 36.6% of valid votes while Atiku received about 29.1%.
Those outcomes informed a generation-wide cynicism about the integrity of the process. Technological and logistical problems accompanied them.
International observers and analysts agreed that the 2023 polls suffered systemic problems. The European Union’s observation noted an erosion of public trust. This was caused by multiple failures in the process. Independent post-mortems documented malfunctions in the BVAS machines. There were also issues with the IReV transmission system. These problems hindered timely and transparent result-sharing.
The technical breakdowns, delayed openings, and missing data were not abstract glitches. They materially undermined verification. They also fed perceptions of opacity that the government still struggles to dispel.
From a comparative and historical standpoint the optics are damaging. Nigeria’s democratic experiment since 1999 has repeatedly been tested by disputed polls. Yet, there is a widely held expectation that the electoral umpire remains above the fray.
Rewarding an incumbent electoral administrator who leaves office amid controversy is risky. It threatens to normalise the idea that contested outcomes can give rise to political patronage. This is instead of fostering institutional reform.
That perception matters. Democratic resilience relies on impartial custodianship of the ballot box. Public confidence is built on the belief that missteps will be corrected rather than compensated.
Politically, the move hands ammunition to critics who argue that the present administration is indifferent to the appearance of impropriety. Atiku’s warning is calculated to provoke public debate about standards. He highlighted that the nomination “risks appearing as a quid pro quo rather than a recognition of merit.” This encourages discussions about precedent and accountability.
If the Presidency intends the nomination as recognition of Yakubu’s long public service, it will need to pair the gesture with concrete commitments. These should include robust electoral reform, transparent recruitment, and an unambiguous firewall between partisan advantage and state appointments.
For the Senate the test is now procedural and symbolic. Quickly confirming without scrutiny will indicate that political convenience is prioritized over institutional repair. On the other hand, conducting rigorous hearings could be a small but meaningful step towards restoring confidence.
The nomination has re-opened a national conversation. It is about how Nigeria rebuilds trust after one of its most contested elections in recent memory. The country needs more than rhetoric. It requires demonstrable reforms. These reforms should make the next election less vulnerable to the same technical failures and political mistrust.
Follow us on our broadcast channels today!
- WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
- Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
- Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng
