Nigeria

‘Magu’s N4 billion bribe allegation’: Osinbajo expresses rage at ‘criminal defamation’

By Taiwo Adebowale

Vice President Yemi Osinbajo has, in response to an allegation that he criminally received N4 billion from disgraced former EFCC Acting Chairman Ibrahim Magu, declared that he will not be distracted by campaigns of lies & calumny.

Vice President Yemi Osinbajo accuses of criminally receiving N4 billion from disgraced former EFCC Chairman Ibrahim Magu.

The vice president made this denial through his media aide, Laolu Akande, who issued a statement to that effect on Wednesday, July 8, 2020.

He said: “The attention of the Office of the Vice President has been drawn to a series of tweets and online publications by PointBlank News and Newsreel.com.ng today 8th July 2020, credited to the same person, one Jackson Ude.

“In essence, Ude’s story is that “embattled former Chairman of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, allegedly embezzled over N39 billion and gave Vice President Yemi Osinabjo (sic) N4 billion, after the VP gave instructions to him to release some of the recovered loots…” The same Jackson Ude has also been circulating a video on YouTube with a female commentator, peddling the same lies.

“With all emphasis at our disposal, let it be firmly stated that these are totally false and baseless fabrications purporting to reflect goings-on at the Probe Panel investigating Mr. Ibrahim Magu. They are indeed completely absurd in every respect.

“Sadly, such mindless, vicious and reckless publications have now become the preferred tool of unscrupulous and reprobate elements in our society who are procured with monetary inducement to peddle blatant falsehood, tarnish the image of upright public officials and mislead unsuspecting Nigerians.

“Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, SAN, will of course not be distracted by these obvious campaigns of lies and calumny. The online publications, being criminally defamatory in nature, have been referred to the relevant law enforcement agencies for investigation and necessary action.”

It is however doubtful if the above statement is enough to dissuade those who are already calling for a deeper probe by the presidential panel into the said fabricated allegation.