}

Kidnapping in Nigeria has ceased to be sporadic crime. It now reads as a parallel economy with its own balance sheet, supply chains and regional hubs. A new SBM Intelligence study covering July 2024 to June 2025 shows kidnappers demanded roughly ₦48 billion in ransom over 12 months and secured verified payments of about ₦2.56–2.57 billion.

Those payments bought freedom for some victims but they also underwrote a widening criminal market that now reaches into the judiciary, commerce and village life.

SBM’s tally is stark. In the year under review at least 4,722 civilians were abducted in 997 separate incidents and some 762 people were killed in abduction-related violence. The data signal a steady professionalisation of kidnapping.

Small cells that once preyed on remote roads now coordinate mass abductions, negotiate bulk ransom demands and, in some regions, run extractive enterprises that resemble forced labour. These are not isolated bandit camps. They are emergent criminal networks with territorial reach.

What is new and worrying is the scale of single-incident demands. SBM flags the 15 March 2025 abduction in Delta State of two girls and an aunt in Ebedei Ukwuole. That case alone saw kidnappers demand N30 billion.

Singular incidents of that magnitude skew national totals, but they also reveal a deliberate strategy. By making eye-watering naira demands kidnappers attempt to hedge against currency devaluation and extract maximum local purchasing power from terrified families.

The Delta case is a warning that kidnappers now price trauma as a lucrative commodity.

The study also exposes an unsettling marriage between ideologically driven terror groups and commercial kidnap syndicates. SBM documents instances where Islamist groups collected very large ransoms.

The high-profile abduction of Justice Haruna Mshelia last year ended only after a substantial payment reportedly pegged at N766 million — a transfer that alone accounted for nearly 30 percent of the ransom total recorded by SBM for the whole year.

The conclusion is unavoidable. At least some terror groups have monetised ideology and are using ransom flows to sustain insurgency and expand influence.

The macroeconomic frame matters. SBM points out that despite record naira figures, the dollar value of ransom receipts has barely budged. The roughly ₦2.56 billion paid translates to about $1.66 million.

By contrast ₦653.7 million in 2022 equated to approximately $1.13 million at the prevailing exchange rate then.

In plain terms criminals raise naira demands to offset currency depreciation. The arithmetic of devaluation thus incentivises ever larger domestic demands and helps explain the inflationary spiral of ransom requests.

The human geography of the crisis is also shifting. Historically concentrated in the northwest and parts of the north east, kidnapping has seeded deep into the South South and South East where economic kidnapping, targeted religious abduction and corporate extortion are on the rise.

SBM’s year-on-year comparisons show a widening footprint and a creeping normalisation of ransom negotiation as an expected response to abduction.

This diffusion undermines local markets, deters investment and displaces livelihoods in farming, trading and transport.

Why has the state failed to stop this? Weak intelligence fusion, opaque ransom flows, corrupt procurement and the absence of robust asset tracing all feature.

Equally important is an economic context that leaves large populations vulnerable to recruitment by criminal entrepreneurs.

Where legitimate work is scarce and the currency is volatile, the calculus for joining an abduction cell changes.

That is why SBM recommends an integrated response that pairs targeted law enforcement with financial disruption and economic stabilisation.

The idea is simple. Starve kidnappers of ill-gotten liquidity and you shrink their capacity to pay fighters, buy weapons or bribe officials.

Policy options must be urgent and practical. First, establish a centralised federal task force that combines military, police, NFIU and telecoms data for rapid intelligence sharing.

Second, mandate forensic tracing of ransom payments and freeze suspect accounts, with international cooperation to curb cross-border laundering.

Third, protect and support witnesses and victims’ families so they can refuse to transact with extortionists.

Fourth, stabilise exchange rate volatility to undercut the incentive that drives ever larger naira demands.

Finally, invest in community policing and local development to reduce the recruitment base of kidnap gangs.

The country sits at an inflection point. The kidnap industry has matured into a revenue model that straddles criminal and terror actors. Left unchecked it will ossify, entrench local patronage systems and hollow out sections of the country economically and socially.

The SBM figures are not just statistics. They are the ledger of a business that trades in fear. If policy remains reactive rather than structural, Nigeria will watch this market consolidate further.


Follow us on our broadcast channels today!


Discover more from Atlantic Post

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Trending

Discover more from Atlantic Post

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Atlantic Post

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading