The Presidency on Thursday dismissed what it termed reckless allegations. These came from opposition parties regarding the newly signed Electoral Act. It insisted that the law strengthens transparency. It merely provides a practical fallback where electronic transmission fails.
The Statehouse spoke through a terse but pointed press brief. It accused the African Democratic Congress of manufacturing alarm for headlines. The same accusation was made against the New Nigeria Peoples Party. They were urged to engage the law on its merits instead.
The statement argued that the Act affirms the primacy of physical polling unit result forms. It recognises electronic transmission as long as the technology functions as intended.
What the Presidency said and why it matters
The core of the dispute is technical wording that the Presidency says simply recognises two things at the same time.
First, the real-time electronic transmission of polling unit results is lawful. It is encouraged to send these results to the Independent National Electoral Commission results portal.
Second, that where transmission is interrupted, the physical result recorded on Form EC8A remains the definitive legal record.
The statement insists that the fallback is a common sense protection against network failure. It does not amount to a licence for manipulation.
Opposition leaders held a high-profile press conference in Abuja on Thursday. They denounced the Act as anti-democratic. They called for an urgent review.
They argued the fallback risks reintroducing manual manipulation and undermines the integrity of real-time reporting.
The Presidency described those claims as “reckless.” They also considered them “spurious.” The Presidency urged the dissenting parties to tackle internal weaknesses. They should focus on that rather than cry foul.
IReV, Form EC8A and where authority lies
Two technical elements are at the centre of the argument.
The first is the INEC Results Viewing portal, commonly known as IReV.The portal displays images and uploads of polling unit results to the public in near real time.
INEC and technology specialists stress that IReV serves as a transparency and viewing tool. It is not a formal collating centre where final legal adjudication occurs.
That legal weight, under the new Act, remains attached to the physical result forms and their proper authentication.
The second element, Form EC8A, is understood in the law as the physical slip. It is completed at each polling unit. It shows votes cast.
The Electoral Act amendment stipulates that if electronic transmission cannot be completed, the result recorded on the physical form will be considered valid. This validity is subject to the normal verification and collation process.
Critics worry this creates a “plan B” that could be exploited. Supporters argue it is the necessary safeguard in a country with unreliable networks in many polling zones.
Direct primaries, delegates and the politics of party reform
The Statehouse also challenged opposition complaints about the reintroduction of direct primaries and endorsement of consensus voting.
The press note framed the change as a move away from delegate-based selection. It emphasized a shift towards member-driven choice. This aligns party practice with systems used in mature presidential democracies.
According to the Presidency, removing delegate primaries restores agency to party members. It reduces the corrupt influence of godfatherism. Delegate selection has been accused of promoting this influence.
Opposition figures counter that the switching rules disadvantage smaller parties. They also argue that the speed of the Act’s passage left inadequate space for constructive amendments.
That tension between speed and inclusiveness in law making has sparked much of the debate. This has been the case since the bill’s hurried legislative passage and presidential assent.
Comparative perspective and the practical problem of technology
Comparative democracies that use electronic transmission also preserve physical records as part of an audit trail. Technology is an efficiency and transparency tool but rarely the sole source of legal truth.
In jurisdictions where transmission is authoritative, extensive redundancy and end-to-end cryptographic safeguards are mandatory.
Nigerian reformers face the practical problem of patchy network coverage. They also deal with varying power supply. Additionally, there is logistical complexity across thousands of polling units.
The inclusion of Form EC8A as a legally recognised fallback reflects a practical constraint. It is not an ideological preference for manual systems.
The credibility test
Public confidence will be the final arbiter. If INEC demonstrates reliable real-time uploads and a transparent cross-checking regime, the portal will bolster confidence and dampen scepticism.
If uploads fail on polling day and the fallback process is opaque, critics will have grounds to assert manipulation.
The Presidency has tasked INEC with publishing clear regulations. It should also provide timetables and verification protocols. This will remove ambiguity and reassure observers and parties.
What to watch next
INEC regulations and guidance: the commission must publish operational rules that translate statutory language into practice. Clear technical and audit procedures will be decisive.
Judicial challenges: test cases may reach election tribunals and courts where interpretation of the Act’s fallback provisions will be settled.
Opposition strategy: whether parties pursue legislative amendment, litigation, or electoral mobilisation will shape the political temperature ahead of 2027.
Verdict
The Presidency’s rebuke of the opposition reads as both defence and provocation. It defends the technical architecture of the new law. It questions the motives of parties that lost influence under the new rules.
Much of the immediate risk is political rhetoric rather than legal substance. Yet rhetoric matters.
The credibility of the 2027 polls will depend on clarity in implementation. Demonstrable technical reliability is crucial. All actors must be willing to contest results through institutions rather than street theatre.
Follow us on our broadcast channels today!
- WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
- Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
- Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng
