President Bola Tinubu’s directive to withdraw Nigeria Police Force officers from VIP escort and guard duties has passed its first field test in Lagos and, on paper, looks like a decisive move towards refocusing the Force on core policing.
A special enforcement team was deployed by Force Headquarters. They carried out monitoring across the Lekki-Ikoyi Link Bridge and the domestic wing of Murtala Muhammed International Airport. They also monitored other strategic points on 6 December 2025. The team reported a high level of compliance.
No unauthorised deployments were recorded during the exercise and no arrests were made, according to the Force public relations statement.
That compliance is welcome. The announcement raises more questions than it answers. This is worrying for a country in the grip of a declared national security emergency.
President Tinubu has ordered a major security shake up. This includes the rapid expansion and redeployment of uniformed personnel. They will fight escalating kidnappings and banditry.
The credibility of the VIP withdrawal hinges on whether policing numbers, freed by the policy, actually reach the frontline. They should be used to protect vulnerable communities. Otherwise, they often be absorbed into other administrative tasks.
The scale of the problem the order seeks to address is stark. Recent estimates put the Nigeria Police Force at roughly 370,000 officers. Yet multiple analyses and reporting suggest that a very large slice of that strength is reserved for non-essential tasks. Reports have cited figures in excess of 100,000 officers. These officers are routinely seconded to VIP protection, domestic security details, and non-policing assignments.
That mismatch helps explain the yawning gap between official capacity and ground reality. This is evident when it comes to street patrols, crime prevention, and emergency response.
History shows this is not the first police reform to promise reallocation of resources. The Police Act 2020 sought to modernise the Force and reassert accountability and proper deployment. Yet implementation has been inconsistent.
Past pledges to return officers to community policing were repeatedly diluted. Political pressures diverted manpower to protect individuals instead of the public.
The present effort must be paired with transparent redeployment data. It also requires independent audits and consequences for breaches. Without these actions, the same pattern may reassert itself.
International comparisons offer a practical template. Leading democracies concentrate VIP protection in specialist units within national or metropolitan police services. They also rely on a mixed model. In this model, well-regulated private protection firms operate under strict oversight. State specialists handle the highest risk profiles.
London’s Protection Command is a consolidated, trained and accountable unit that provides close protection without hollowing out general policing. Nigeria would benefit from a similar, tightly regulated model coupled with public reporting on personnel movements.
Finally the political context cannot be ignored. Pressure from rising insecurity adds tension. External scrutiny over human rights amplifies this tension. Contested narratives about violence against religious communities further create a combustible atmosphere. The withdrawal of escorts is necessary but not sufficient.
To achieve safer streets through compliance, the government must publish clear redeployment plans. It should measure patrol and response coverage both before and after the change. Additionally, the savings should be invested in community policing, training, and intelligence-led operations. Without accountability the announcement risks becoming another headline while citizens wait for the protection they were promised.
Follow us on our broadcast channels today!
- WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
- Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
- Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng
