Atlantic Post

They knocked on doors and sent messages and travelled at dawn to desert towns and flooded villages. They plastered portraits on walls and posted names in online groups and prayed. They waited for phones to ring. For thousands of Nigerian families the wait has become the work of every day.

Since 2014, and with brutal acceleration since 2020, tens of thousands of Nigerians have simply vanished from their communities. Some were taken by armed groups or criminal gangs.

Some never returned from market trips or border crossings. Others were swept away by floodwaters or lost in chaotic migration routes. For the families left behind the state has been inconsistent.

Police stations sometimes refused to file reports. Courts moved slowly. Official data has been scarce. Civil society stepped in to register cases and link relatives. The scale and variety of disappearances raise hard questions.

Is Nigeria facing a single crisis with many causes or many separate failures stitched together by a common outcome a missing person The answer matters because each reading carries a different remedy

A single number helps sharpen the shock. International humanitarian organisations and domestic groups documenting disappearances report figures in the tens of thousands.

Those numbers bind together very different stories a teenager lured from a market a farmer taken in a night raid a woman swept away in floods and families still seeking explanation after a decade.

Yet the headline figure hides local concentrations in the northeast and the south east and a rising pattern of kidnappings for ransom elsewhere. The tragedy is both mass and personal.

The cruelty of the long silence the absence of authoritative information and the multiple institutional failures demand an account that follows victims from home to court to bush to burial ground. This investigation is that account

Key findings at a glance:

Humanitarian registrations indicate well over 20,000 missing people across Nigeria a figure concentrated in conflict affected states and among minors.

Kidnap for ransom has surged into urban and peri urban areas driving an increasing share of disappearances. Reports show thousands of abductions recorded within a year.

Insurgent and militia abductions in the northeast remain a major source of long term disappearances with high numbers still unaccounted for ten years after mass attacks.

Climate and disaster related losses such as floods have created sudden spikes in missing persons in affected localities and exposed weaknesses in emergency response.

Human rights monitoring and investigative reports document patterns of forced disappearance and extrajudicial detention pointing to institutional abuse as another driver of disappearance.

Method and sources

This investigation combines field interviews with families lawyers and local activists cascade mapping of reportage from national and international media and a close reading of humanitarian registration data and human rights reports.

Where precise case details are sensitive names have been changed and locations narrowed to protect survivors and families. We sought comment from the police and from federal agencies responsible for security and disaster response.

For the most urgent statistical claims we rely on counts openly reported by humanitarian agencies and verified investigative reports. Where those counts point to gaps I have flagged them and sought alternative sources.

Part one: The people behind the numbers

When Aisha Ibrahim set out from Maiduguri in 2016 with five children the road was supposed to be short. They were heading to a relative in a neighbouring village. A landmine or an ambush might have been the danger, she thought, but not disappearance.

Days passed without news. She waited at the relative’s house and then at the hospital and then at the market. The army said it had not detained them. The police recorded a missing person form three weeks later. The family never received a clear account. They were told to wait for the commander to return from patrol.

When a neighbour later arrived with word that a group of women and children had been seen being taken into the bush the family filed for the first time for assistance from humanitarian tracing services. The tracing service located none of them.

Aisha’s family story is far from unique in the northeast. Communities there have endured repeated cycles of mass abduction. The social fabric that once allowed neighbours to coordinate searches has frayed. Road travel is risky. Markets are irregular. State presence is intermittent.

Families we spoke to describe a daily economy of small searches pooling scarce funds hiring motorcycle riders and paying guides.

They speak of the humiliation of being asked for bribes to file official reports the exhaustion of repeated phone calls to military commands and the slow erosion of trust in any public remedy.

Across Lagos and in the Middle Belt the pattern looks different. In those places kidnapping for ransom is often organised by complex criminal networks. Victims include traders students commuters and drivers.

Families described ransom negotiations that dragged for weeks while police mediation faltered. In many urban cases the missing are returned after payment or after local negotiation with community intermediaries.

In others the ransom is paid and nothing follows. Families report extortion by fake intermediaries and sometimes by officials who demand fees to register a case or to act on evidence.

In the south east and parts of the Delta the missing are linked to armed group activity and alleged extrajudicial operations. Families say young men leave home to visit friends and never return.

They are told by authorities that the missing are in detention only to be told later there is no record of arrest. Lawyers and rights groups described clusters of cases where formal judicial channels were weak and informal violence filled the vacuum.

Part two: The scale and the data

The most authoritative public counts come from humanitarian organisations that register families seeking tracing and support. Those registers are not census level totals. They are partial. But they present a consistent picture of tens of thousands of disappearances.

As of mid 2024 humanitarian registrations documented over 23,000 missing persons in Nigeria a figure that reflects conflict induced disappearances kidnappings migration related loss and disaster casualties.

That number likely undercounts the total because registration relies on families reaching services and because many disappearances are never reported.

Security analysts document a concurrent spike in kidnappings for ransom across the country. Between July 2023 and June 2024 one specialised security monitor recorded over 7,500 kidnappings in more than a thousand incidents.

Those kidnappings generated a cash flow of millions of naira in ransom demands. Kidnapping for profit has professionalised in some regions embedding local networks that combine intelligence on targets with escape routes across porous borders.

The northeast remains the single most concentrated zone of long term missing cases. Mass abductions by extremist groups including Boko Haram and ISWAP in the past decade have left hundreds if not thousands still unaccounted for.

Some high profile cases have persisted in public memory for years. Ten years after the abduction of schoolgirls in Chibok dozens of girls remain missing or in captivity. For those cases the passage of time compounds trauma and complicates rescue prospects.

Human rights investigations show survivors who escaped and families of those still missing are frustrated by slow or opaque official processes.

Disaster events add sudden spikes. Floods landslides and boat accidents produce immediate missing person counts that swell local totals by the hundreds.

In June 2025 devastating floods in parts of central Nigeria left dozens missing in a single town and forced large scale displacement. Emergency services struggled to account for the missing amid damaged roads and overwhelmed hospitals.

Institutional abuse and forced disappearance by security or paramilitary actors are another dimension. Investigative reports and human rights monitors have documented cases where detainees are held without proper records or where arrests are not properly recorded.

Families report being told their relatives are in custody only to find no record in detention centres. In some locales the line between criminal investigation and extrajudicial detention is thin.

The impacts are severe because official denial or absence of records blocks legal remedies. Human rights organisations have flagged patterns that suggest forced disappearance and unlawful detention by state actors.

Those short term spikes feed longer term disappearance tallies when bodies are unrecovered or when displaced people lose contact with families.

Part three: How disappearances happen

There are overlapping mechanisms that produce disappearances. Armed abduction by insurgents and militias is the most visible. Those operations vary in motive from political control to forced recruitment to ransom.

Attacks on schools and mass kidnappings have been a recurring feature in the northeast since 2014. The government has pursued military action against extremist groups but the groups have adapted using small unit tactics night raids and dispersal to avoid direct confrontation.

Kidnapping for ransom in peaceful areas is often the product of organised criminal networks. These networks use surveillance and inside information. They sometimes collude with transport workers corrupt security officials or local political actors.

Victims are selected for perceived ability to pay or symbolic effect. The commercialisation of kidnapping has turned disappearance into a revenue model for criminal entrepreneurs.

Migration and trafficking are also important. Young Nigerians travel irregularly to cross borders seeking work or to join diaspora routes. Some never arrive at their destination. Smugglers and traffickers do not always keep viable records. Migrants who disappear are often invisible to both origin and destination state services.

Finally, accidents and disasters account for a share of missing persons. Nigeria’s rainy season brings flood risk and riverine communities routinely report boat capsize incidents where passengers went missing.

In poorer regions the absence of safety equipment and trained rescue teams increases fatality and disappearance rates.

Part four: Voices of families and intermediaries

We recorded hours of interviews with people searching for missing relatives and with activists who trace cases. Their testimony reveals recurring practical obstacles

One woman told how a police officer demanded a payment to file a missing person report and to begin a search. Several families reported logistical barriers that make filing a report expensive. They cited transport costs to the nearest station and repeated visits to chase responses.

A human rights lawyer described the difficulty of obtaining detention records. He said in some cases authorities claim a person was detained then provide no paperwork. The administrative mismatch prevents wills property transfers and any legal follow up.

A tracing volunteer in the northeast spoke of families who register with humanitarian tracing networks and then wait months for any information. She described weak coordination between military patrols and humanitarian registries.

Patrol routes are not shared with aid groups for operational security reasons meaning tracing teams cannot always follow up on tips.

Community leaders in urban districts described local mediation as a survival mechanism. Traditional authorities sometimes negotiated releases in ways the formal state could not.

Those deals produce returns but they also normalise extra legal payments and give power to local strongmen rather than public institutions.

Part five: Failures of official investigation

State institutions have made some efforts in the past to address disappearances but the record is uneven. Police forces are overstretched and in many areas lack the specialist capacity to investigate complex abduction networks.

Where investigations are opened families complain of long delays and little transparency.

There are systemic problems in data management. Arrests are often logged inconsistently. Records are not centralised.

When a family reports a disappearance there is no guaranteed pathway to ensure coordination between state agencies security forces and humanitarian groups. This fragmentation creates space for what families call stonewalling.

Prosecutions are rare. When arrests are made the judicial process is slow. Some suspects are held without charge for protracted periods.

Others are released for lack of evidence. The consequence is twofold. Perpetrators are not deterred and families lose faith in official remedies.

Part six: Who bears responsibility

Responsibility is shared. Armed groups are culpable for mass abductions. Criminal networks are culpable for commercial kidnappings.

State agencies are culpable when they fail to act to prevent abduction to rescue victims or to ensure a prompt transparent investigation. But responsibility also rests with political leadership that tolerates corruption and fails to invest in prevention and protection

At root are political failures. Weak rule of law underpins many of the drivers of disappearance. Without robust oversight of security forces and without proper safeguards in detention and arrest procedures the state itself becomes a vector of disappearance.

Where political leaders prosecute accountability selectively the incentive structure encourages impunity.

Part seven: The economic toll

The economic effect on families is immediate and often catastrophic. Ransoms drain savings. Business owners lose capital while searching for relatives. Young breadwinners vanish. Women told of being forced to sell land and possessions to pay for searches and food. Local economies suffer when consumers avoid markets seen as insecure.

Nationally the cost is harder to quantify but large flows of ransom payments and transaction costs are a transfer from legitimate economic activity into criminal economies. That extraction of wealth undermines enterprise and investor confidence and shifts resources away from development.

Part eight: Policy gaps and international standards

International humanitarian practice provides a toolkit for tracing re establishing contact and documenting disappearances.

Countries with better outcomes tend to have centralised missing persons registries statutory duties on detention record keeping and specialised police units to investigate abduction networks.

They also maintain accessible victim support services including legal assistance and psychosocial support.

Nigeria has elements of this architecture but implementation is patchy. Civil society and humanitarian agencies perform vital functions but cannot substitute for a functioning state response.

The absence of a national centralised registry of missing persons and inconsistent detention documentation are policy gaps that are repeatedly cited by practitioners and families.

Pursuing accountability for forced disappearances requires legal clarity and political will. Where domestic mechanisms are weak international human rights law can provide pressure points but only if access to evidence and witness protection are available.

Part nine: What must change

Prevention

Prevention must be multi sectoral. Investing in police capacity to investigate abduction networks is essential. Building trustworthy and corruption resistant processes to record arrests and detentions would reduce the space for state linked disappearance.

Investment in early warning for communities at risk and targeted social programmes to reduce the conditions that make kidnapping profitable must be part of the plan.

Rescue and recovery

Rescue efforts need co ordinated intelligence and properly resourced rapid response teams. Where military operations are required they must be accompanied by efforts to protect civilians and by mechanisms to share non sensitive information with tracing teams. For disasters and accidents investment in search and rescue capacity especially in flood prone communities is vital.

Justice and redress

Specialised investigative units for kidnapping and abduction with trained prosecutors could increase the rate of successful prosecutions. Legislative reforms that mandate detention record keeping access to counsel and independent oversight of security forces would reduce the risk of state linked disappearances.

Support for families

Families require financial legal and psychosocial support. States should fund tracing services and victim support or partner formally with humanitarian agencies to scale services. Removing fees at the point of filing a missing person report and simplifying reporting mechanisms would lower barriers to recording cases.

Transparency and data

Creating a public national registry that aggregates anonymised case data would improve accountability and help identify patterns. The registry must be designed to protect victims and not to expose vulnerable people to further risk.

Better data flows between police hospitals disaster agencies and humanitarian registries would narrow the blind spots that currently stretch across institutions.

Part ten: Case studies

Case study 1: The river town that never found coffins

In a riverine community on the banks of a major river a market boat capsized in the rainy season. Dozens were reported missing. Local volunteers searched. The regional emergency service arrived late because bridges were washed away.

Hospitals were overwhelmed. Some bodies were recovered weeks later others were never found. For families the absence of closure meant no funeral rites no property settlement and no formal record of death.

The state paid a small relief grant but no systematic inquiry into safety standards for river transport followed. The episode amplified a known vulnerability boat safety standards were already poor but policy change did not follow the tragedy.

Case study 2: The student who did not come home

A university student boarded a night bus to visit family in another state. He never arrived. The family called the bus company the driver and the police. They paid a local intermediary who said the boy had been abducted and that a ransom would be demanded.

The family paid part of the ransom. Weeks later the driver reported he had no record and the police said they had no suspects. The tracing service filed a case but could not locate the student. The family still receives messages from unknown numbers demanding more money.

The state has no evidence one way or the other. The case is emblematic of urban kidnapping where partial returns coexist with unresolved disappearances.

Case study 3: Long term disappearance in the northeast

Ten years after a mass abduction by an extremist group a cluster of families still search for missing girls. Some girls escaped and some were released. Others remain unaccounted for.

Campaigners say official follow up on the missing has slowed as the cases aged and as national attention shifted to other crises. The enduring absence has become an indictment of how episodic government attention can be.

Part eleven: Barriers to reform

Political economy matters. Ransom payments create local demand for impunity. Corruption inside institutions corrodes incentives to investigate. Insecure funding for police and judicial reform programs means projects are short lived.

Where political leaders prioritise short term political survival over institutional reform they undermine the long term capacity needed to prevent disappearance.

There is also a cultural barrier. Families sometimes fear stigma in reporting certain types of disappearance particularly those that might be framed as migration or trafficking. That stigma suppresses reporting and reduces data quality.

Finally the global aid environment matters. Donor fatigue and shifting priorities mean that funding for tracing and family support is fragile and project based rather than structural.

Part twelve: What accountability looks like

Accountability is both criminal and administrative. Criminal accountability means effective investigations prosecutions and sentences for kidnappers abusers and those who profit from disappearances.

Administrative accountability includes reforms to detention record keeping oversight mechanisms and the removal of economic barriers to reporting.

International mechanisms can help where domestic systems fail. Human rights bodies and humanitarian agencies can apply pressure but their leverage depends on clear data.

Civil society must be supported to continue documenting cases and to provide legal representation to families.

Part thirteen The human cost

Numbers are blunt instruments. Behind every entry in a register is a life altered. Parents struggle with not knowing whether to hold funerals. Children grow up without a father or mother.

Land disputes emerge when a missing owner cannot sign title documents. In some communities the social role of missing persons never returns.

The slow administrative handling of missing cases is itself a form of secondary violence adding insult to harm.

Part fourteen A way forward

Change requires a national strategy that stitches together prevention response recovery and redress.

The pillars should include a national registry of missing persons properly resourced and secured standardised detention record keeping national protocols for tracing and family support and specialised investigative capacity for abductions.

Practical immediate steps would include removing fees for filing missing person reports expanding mobile reporting units for remote areas and establishing emergency legal aid for families required to negotiate ransom demands.

Building trust between communities and security forces will require independent oversight of arrests and transparent reporting of detention.

Civil society has shown how resilient communities can be in responding to disappearance. The state needs to move from a fragmented ad hoc posture to one of durable institutional responsibility.

Conclusion

Nigeria’s rising missing person cases are not a single phenomenon with a single cure. They are the consequence of conflict criminality environmental disaster and institutional dysfunction. Families bear the burdens. The state bears responsibility.

The path to fewer disappearances runs through better policing better disaster preparedness better judicial safeguards and above all political will.

Without sustained attention the numbers will continue to mount and the work of waiting will remain the daily labour of too many Nigerians

---

Follow us on our broadcast channels today!

• WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawZ8TbDDmFT1a1Syg46
• Telegram: https://t.me/atlanticpostchannel
• Facebook: https://www.messenger.com/channel/atlanticpostng